On Aug 11, 2011, at 8:24 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:49:22AM -0400, Richard Kulawiec wrote:
> 
>> And actually, no, you can't *always* tell those discussion apart,
>> nor can you tell them from off-list replies.
> 
> List headers don't guarantee helping with that, though, either,
> because many lists will supporess the echo of the list mail to you if
> you are also mentioned in the addressee headers.  Given the prevalence
> of people using reply-all, that happens often.  Then some mail in the
> discussion arrives in your inbox and other mail arrives in the list
> box.  And yes, this could be alleviated by people replying just to the
> list, but a lot of mail clients seem not to provide a convenient way
> to do that.

:0 Whc: msgid.lock
| formail -D 8192 msgid.cache
:0 a:
.duplicates/

is pretty much magical if you have the ability to procmail.

> I don't want the additional subject line cruft, but the list headers
> are not a magic answer.
> 
> A
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> a...@anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to