On Aug 31, 2011, at 10:42 AM, John C Klensin wrote: > We ought to, IMO, be permitting > publication of PS documents at the second level as long as there > are no _obvious_ ambiguities that cannot be figured out (the > same way) by people of good will acting in good faith and with > help from WG lists and as long as there are no other "known > [technical] defects".
That would be fine with me if we could somehow effectively discourage deployment of proposed standards in products. But that's a lost cause, IMO. Keith
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
