I think you will see that this question was discussed at least once. We asked about moving to a one-level maturity model instead. The conclusion was that it was possible to go from a two-level to a one-level in the future if that is appropriate. However, if we go straight to a one-level now, and then learn that a two-level would have been better, we would be stuck.
Russ On Sep 11, 2011, at 7:50 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: > I personally view it as a tiny effort to remove an unused feature from our > process. It could have removed two levels instead of one, but would that have > made it easier or harder to find consensus for the change? _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
