Is the problem that they don't get what IPv6 is for? Or that we haven't articulated the use cases appropriately?
Alternatively, Is there something they are trying to achieve other than "more=good?" Greg Daley > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Sabahattin Gucukoglu > Sent: Thursday, 1 December 2011 11:08 AM > To: ietf@ietf.org > Subject: Netfilter (Linux) Does IPv6 NAT > > In case you didn't see this: > http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Netfilter-developers-working-on- > NAT-for-ip6tables-1385877.html > > It's a complete IPv6 NAT implementation with the functionality of the > IPv4 one in the same stack. ALGs. Port translation. Connection > tracking. You don't need me to tell you why I don't like this. > > Cheers, > Sabahattin > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
