> From: "George, Wes" <wesley.geo...@twcable.com>
> I've been recommending this direction (that this is basically just more
> private space, no magic)
Is that wise? I thought (IIRC, and maybe I'm spacing) the whole reason for
allocating this space was that 1918 space _couldn't_ easily be used for CGN
because there were too many conflicting usages. So, now we're making more 1918
space? This is a good idea... how? If we need more 1918 space, let's do so
deliberately, and not kill the usefulness of this space for CGN. (Unless, of
course...)
Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
