> On 02/23/2012 13:51, ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com wrote:
> > Old news perhaps, but an unavoidable consequence of this is that the
> > oft-repeated assertions that various systems have been "IPv6 ready for over
> > 10
> > years" don't involve a useful definition of the term "ready".
> The OP specified "IPv4 only network." I suspect that if he had IPv6
> connectivity his experience would have been quite different. I happily
> use Windows XP on a dual-stack network, for example.
And systems running these old OS versions never under any circumstances move
from one network to another where connectivity conditions change. Riiight.
Ned
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
