> On 02/23/2012 13:51, ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com wrote: > > Old news perhaps, but an unavoidable consequence of this is that the > > oft-repeated assertions that various systems have been "IPv6 ready for over > > 10 > > years" don't involve a useful definition of the term "ready".
> The OP specified "IPv4 only network." I suspect that if he had IPv6 > connectivity his experience would have been quite different. I happily > use Windows XP on a dual-stack network, for example. And systems running these old OS versions never under any circumstances move from one network to another where connectivity conditions change. Riiight. Ned _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf