Hi Barry,
At 13:53 01-03-2012, Barry Leiba wrote:
It certainly does, in the first paragraph:
I missed that.
Section 3:
7. The PRIORITY extension is valid for the submission service
[RFC6409] and LTMP [RFC2033].
And that one.
This is my major concern about this protocol as well, as I note in the
PROTO writeup (which, unfortunately, can't be seen publicly because of
a limitation in the datatracker; perhaps I should post it here). I'm
interested in hearing whether others share this concern, and what the
community consensus is about it.
I read the PROTO writeup. The other problem may be a bug. I did not
report it.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
