> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of SM > Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 1:36 PM > To: ietf@ietf.org > Cc: Alexey Melnikov > Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple > Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to > Proposed Standard > > This draft also defines the MT-Priority header field. It is quite > unusual for a SMTP extension specification to define a mail header > field. If I had an reservations about this draft, it would be on > architectural grounds. The draft tries really hard to transfer > priority information over the Internet and in a foreign environment. > Although the draft is well-written and can be implemented, I have > doubts about whether it will achieve its objective. I unfortunately > cannot support the publication of this draft as a Proposed Standard.
It's certainly true that this could be done as a pair of clustered drafts, but since they are clearly meant to be used together, and indeed have to be when tunneling priority information through non-participating environments, their coupling into a single draft makes sense to me. Doubling the work of the IESG and the RFC Editor doesn't seem reasonable here. -MSK _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
