On 4/20/2012 6:36 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
What about the idea of requiring new Experimental documents to include text that indicates when the experiment is to be considered completed absent new work on it? Essentially, the document declares a date by which the experiment is considered concluded,
...
To Eliot's point, work that is resumed much later could always restore document and code point status and declare new drop-dead dates when it becomes interesting again.
As Brian notes, "dates" are probably unlikely to be useful while also imposing additional administrative tracking overhead.
On the other hand, objective performance/achievement criteria -- statements that describe what experiential information is being sought -- would be useful to encourage. d/ -- -- Dave Crocker bbiw.net
