On 4/20/12 7:23 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Exactly. This whole discussion seems to be about over-engineering a small corner of the IETF process that isn't a particular source of practical problems anyway, afaik.
Reading the back-and-forth on this I think at this point I feel pretty strongly that I don't support the proposal. If someone wants to take it upon themselves to badger authors of drafts that might be published as experimental protocols, fine, but even while (heaven knows) I'm a fan of "process" stuff this really seems overly legalistic and not a solution for anything that's clearly a problem. So, no. Melinda
