On Oct 26, 2012, at 8:16 AM, Eliot Lear <l...@cisco.com> wrote: > Andrew, > > On 10/25/12 9:52 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: >> Oh, for heaven's sake. This is nothing to do with punishment. This is >> a straightforward administrative problem. Turning this into an >> opportunity to exercise a heavyweight and in fact punitive process >> would be an injustice. If the IETF has wound itself into such >> bureaucratic knots that we can't just make an exceptional decision in >> exceptional circumstances, we are in much worse trouble than I thought. A > > And as of yet nobody has challenged the need to remove Marshall. We've > just gone off the deep end on process.
What?! You are trying to say that the IETF ratholed on process? Never… http://www.cafepress.com/mf/33235226/ietf-process-organic-cotton-tee_tshirt W > Yes, let's close the process > problem as Brian said in due course. Let's also not rush through the > changes for all the reasons that John Klensin wrote, plus another: I > don't like the proposed approach, but that's for another message. > > Eliot > > -- "When it comes to glittering objects, wizards have all the taste and self-control of a deranged magpie." -- Terry Pratchett
