SM, I was following this working group which will likely be shut down because > there is not enough participation. There are quite a few working group > which fit that profile. I prefer not to view things as "actually not in a > bad place" as it encourages complacency. >
Back in the 90s, I chaired a WG that regularly had less than 10 attendees, but all of them were interested and contributed, and we got a good set of RFCs as a result. You don't need a large number of participants, just committed ones. I do agree though, that was a good response from Riccardo. Cheers, Andy
