Btw: RFC3777 3.7.2 seems to define only the criteria to be applied by NomCom, not for the confirming body.
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:21:41AM -0500, Margaret Wasserman wrote: > > Hi Russ, > > On Mar 5, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Russ Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com> wrote: > > The rest of your question ought to be discussed at the TSVAREA meeting in > > Orlando. > > I have looked at the agenda of the TSV Area Open Meeting (on Wednesday from > 9:00am to 11:30am), and it includes the following item: > > "- Open Mic about "Area Expectations for the TSV ADs" -- 60 minutes > The questions we will ask the community: > - what is the existing description we gave to NomCom. > - does the community agree with it? > - is it reasonable, or are we asking too much?" > > By "description we gave to the NomCom" do you mean the IESG's list of desired > criteria? Is the NomCom also going to report on the criteria that they came > up with, after considering the IESG's input and whatever input they received > from the community? > > I am a little bit confused about the purpose of this meeting. Is it for the > IESG to get feedback on their desired criteria, so that those criteria could > potentially be updated for future years? Or is it for the nomcom to get > further information from the community in order to determine the actual > criteria the nomcom will use (based on input from both the IESG and the > community) to fill the open TSV AD position this year? > > I would like to know the purpose of the meeting, because I believe it would > be appropriate for me to participate in a discussion of the former topic, but > not the latter. > > Margaret > > > > > -- --- Toerless Eckert, eck...@cisco.com Cisco NSSTG Systems & Technology Architecture SDN: Let me play with the network, mommy!
