On 03/10/13 09:12, Brian Trammell allegedly wrote: >> Solve it with better management, not artificial barriers that are >> imposed on everyone and that can be trivially routed around, albeit >> without the benefits of using the I-D mechanism.
> This seems like something that could be left to the discretion of the > chairs on setting the agenda for each WG meeting, as long as there's > transparency in the criteria that will be used to decide whether a > recently-submitted draft can be discussed on the agenda. Yes, place the decision in the WGs. Once upon a time in a WG far away we did say "You can submit drafts and discuss them on the mailing list any time you want, but the agenda for the meeting will be set two weeks in advance."
