On Mar 24, 2013, at 7:23 PM, Joel M. Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
> It ought to be concerned with giving credit to folks who made particularly > large, but not authorship level, contributions to the document. +1 Further, the IETF should acknowledge that the contents of Acknowledgments sections varies widely between RFCs. Some are fairly complete, some are fairly vague and incomplete, and some are between. If you feel like you should be listed in the Acknowledgements section of a WG document due to your contribution, and you're not listed in WG Last Call, ask the WG to be included. 'Nuff said. --Paul Hoffman
