Some people never recognise new comers ideas until backed up with old comer idea. Do you think that is right? I agree with your suggestion only if the IETF editor team agree to include you in the possibility of produce team ideas. I don't think all working groups in the IETF are giving chance to people/mew-comers to involve/participate, my experience that I am ignored, so the best way to be valuable for future reader, is not to let some team to exclude others. From my experience, I see that some teams just want their document to go through IESG without comments/delays. Do you think that is good for the process? This ignorance should be fixed.
AB On 3/25/13, Melinda Shore <melinda.sh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/24/13 10:02 PM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote: >> I like what we have so far, but are those connected >> processes/information reflected into the produced document? Why >> ignoring names of volunteers? I suggest to fix this, > > My experience over lo, these many years is that the best way to ensure > that you're recognized is to produce text/suggestions/ideas that other > people find valuable. > > Melinda > >