On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Brian E Carpenter < brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. DRM is a fact of life, and it is therefore better that there should > be a well-formulated standard than a free-for-all. A free-for-all is a > guaranteed route to non-interoperability. > Crack cocaine, prostitution, and political corruption are also facts of life. OK, pardon the cheap shot, but I don’t think SDOs that have some sort of stewardship relationship to the Internet should ever play any part whatsoever in the facilitation of DRM. I won’t consume your input bandwidth by backing up this position; the arguments pro and contra DRM are not exactly secret, and I haven’t heard any new ones in some years. -T