At 12:53 08-05-2013, Randy Bush wrote:
MAY != SHOULD
The text is as follows: "The name SHOULD be fully qualified whenever possible". If the working group would like a RFC 2119 SHOULD it would help if there is an explanation in the sentence for the reader weigh the implications of not following that.
For what it is worth Eric Burger posted an analysis of "SHOULD" usage in a different draft ( http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mile/current/msg01021.html ).
Regards,S. Moonesamy
