On Aug 5, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Scott Brim <scott.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/05/13 07:31, Hadriel Kaplan allegedly wrote: >> Yup, afaict we were doing ok until IETF 87... but at least one anonymous >> jabber participant (named "Guest") did remotely speak multiple times at the >> mic on one of the RAI working group sessions this past week (at RTCWEB if I >> recall). I was personally ok with it, but it was awkward. If folks feel >> it's inappropriate, then we need something else. I'd be ok with just having >> jabber scribes ignore anonymous participants. > > It's inappropriate. Tell them they need to provide at least a name. > Would it be better if they were called "Emma" instead of "Guest" ?
