On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:28 PM, S Moonesamy <sm+i...@elandsys.com> wrote:
> Hi Phillip, > > At 15:53 27-08-2013, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > >> What I found incredibly rude was when an AD and Working Group chair >> actually hissed when I gave my company name at the mic. >> > > I submitted draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-**3184bis During the > discussions (see thread at http://www.ietf.org/mail-** > archive/web/diversity/current/**msg00201.html<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/diversity/current/msg00201.html>)about > the draft it was suggested there should be consequences of not > following the code of conduct. What action would you suggest against: > > (i) the Area Director in a case such as the above? > > (ii) the Working Group chair in a case such as the above? > In that case they were the same person. Which I think was a major structural problem in that nobody on the IESG was prepared to stand up to him. So I would start off by not allowing that situation to occur in the first place. But in general where you have a WG chair that shows blatant bias you have to get rid of that WG chair. If DNSSEC had been my product I would have pushed VeriSign to do more than appeal the Opt-in debacle, I would have litigated. -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
