Valerie,

What type of energy range are you looking at?  How far back do samples go?  

Chris

**********************************************
Dr Christopher Patridge
Associate Professor 
Dept of Chemistry
SASE 315
716-829-8096 | patri...@dyc.edu
www.dyc.edu <http://www.dyc.edu/>

Social: Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/drpatridgc> 



> On Mar 5, 2021, at 11:06 AM, Schoepfer, Valerie <valerie.schoep...@usask.ca> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Matt,
> 
> The backstory is that I'm trying to find which standards will define my 
> samples, so I am pulling standards from different beamlines and years to get 
> a basic linear combination fit, to run new standards myself when I have more 
> beamtime.  
> 
> I'm able to do it in Athena- where you more or less:
> 1. Assign E0 to the first peak in the first derivative of your standard 
> reference foil. 
> 2. Calibrate one standard reference foil to the theoretical edge energy.
> 3. Ensure E0 is right/adjust E0 for all samples and sample foils.
> 4. Align reference foils to the standard reference foil, because the foil 
> will pull the sample with it.
> 
> But in Larch, maybe I'm unsure about the groups function?  I'm not convinced 
> the reference foils 'follow' the sample spectra. 
> If the reference and samples aren't tied together, how do you align samples 
> when your energies are off because of different beamlines or years or people 
> not as careful to calibrate the beamline energy? 
> My first thought was using the first derivative peak of your sample, but if 
> your edge energy shifts because of oxidation state changes, what do you use 
> then?
> 
> 
> I'm still trying to form my question, so let me know if this still doesn't 
> make much sense. 
> Thanks!
> Valerie
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ifeffit <ifeffit-boun...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov> On Behalf Of 
> ifeffit-requ...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> Sent: Thursday, March 4, 2021 12:00 PM
> To: ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> Subject: Ifeffit Digest, Vol 217, Issue 3
> 
> CAUTION: External to USask. Verify sender and use caution with links and 
> attachments. Forward suspicious emails to phish...@usask.ca
> 
> 
> Send Ifeffit mailing list submissions to
>        ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        ifeffit-requ...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        ifeffit-ow...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
> Contents of Ifeffit digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: Larch energy calibration (Matt Newville)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 18:38:24 -0600
> From: Matt Newville <newvi...@cars.uchicago.edu>
> To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit <ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov>
> Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] Larch energy calibration
> Message-ID:
>        <ca+7esbrgytdjidl4x+rcuei+dfml3duyg-r2r-fhffeqshs...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Hi Valerie,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:48 AM Schoepfer, Valerie < 
> valerie.schoep...@usask.ca> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I am using Larch XAS Viewer for the first time to analyze some Mo 
>> XANES data. It is fairly straightforward, however I am running into 
>> problems with energy calibration, which leads to problems with Linear 
>> Combination Fitting.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Right now, which is likely wrong, I?m calibrating the energy of a 
>> standard to the theoretical edge, then auto-aligning the samples to the 
>> standard.
>> But how do reference foils fit in here? Reference foils don?t seem to 
>> be tied to the sample like they are in Athena. Should I be manually aligning?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Is there a general guidance or work flow?
>> 
> 
> It's possible that I do not fully understand the question or that this answer 
> will veer a bit off the topic of your question.
> 
> For sure, energies need to be aligned properly for any multi-spectra 
> comparison or linear method to work well. But it should be that you will have 
> groups of spectra that all share a consistent energy calibration, say from 
> the same beamline/beamtime.
> 
> If you do have a reference channel for every measurement, you can compare 
> those reference channels.  Ideally, these will not vary for every
> measurement - that would indicate a serious problem.   So, I think you
> should be able to group spectra together as uniformly calibrated (hopefully 
> all data from a day or more of beamtime at a particular beamline) and then 
> make sure that the different groups of spectra.  Does that seem reasonable?
> 
> I have to admit that at my beamline I don't often have the luxury or need to 
> run a reference foil for every scan, so we calibrate consistently ahead
> of time.  I'm sure that leads to a bias in the software.   I guess I forgot
> that Athena had the ability to read and tie a second spectrum as a 
> "reference" and use that to auto-apply calibration.
> 
> Is it generally necessary to calibrate many spectra individually, or do 
> people find that doing them in a few large groups is sufficient?
> 
> --Matt
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/pipermail/ifeffit/attachments/20210303/99a209b2/attachment-0001.htm>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ifeffit mailing list
> Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
> Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of Ifeffit Digest, Vol 217, Issue 3
> ***************************************
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ifeffit mailing list
> Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
> Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit

_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit

Reply via email to