Thanks for the info to you both! I now need to decide if I should set up the development branch on my machine, or hack my python-igraph to allow for cairocffi. Which is likely a better move? Possible considerations: - How stable is the development branch right now? - Is there any estimate of when the next version will be released? (with cairocffi presumably baked in) - Is either move likely to cause me any other problems down the line?
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Jeff Alstott <[email protected]> wrote: > I am trying to build and install the development version of igraph and > python-igraph, because I want to use cairocffi instead of pycairo (which > has been implemented in the development, but not version 0.7). However, I'm > having trouble configuring igraph: > > $ls > AUTHORS configure.ac debian igraph_Info.plist.in > INSTALL.WINDOWS msvc optional tests > bootstrap.sh CONTRIBUTING.md doc igraph.pc.in interfaces > NEWS README TODO > ChangeLog COPYING examples include Makefile.am > nexus src tools > > > $./configure > bash: ./configure: No such file or directory > > $chmod +x configure.ac > > $./configure.ac > ./configure.ac: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `igraph,' > ./configure.ac: line 1: `AC_INIT(igraph, esyscmd([tr -d '\n' < VERSION]), > [email protected])' > > > What am I missing? > >
_______________________________________________ igraph-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help
