On Oct 30, 2008, at 1:04 AM, Michele Simionato wrote:
Should I give up the idea of keeping the library in a single file? This is unfortunate, I thought this was a feature of the R6RS module system.
Forgot to comment on this. Actually, this is one of the oft-cited unspecified corners of R6RS. BUT, but, all implementations to-date have very similar library-name->file-name mapping, so, there should not be a problem in practice. (anybody correct me if I'm wrong) Aziz,,,
