On Oct 30, 6:32 am, Abdulaziz Ghuloum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 30, 2008, at 1:04 AM, Michele Simionato wrote: > > > Should I give up the idea of keeping the library in a single file? > > This is unfortunate, I thought this was a feature of the R6RS module > > system. > > Forgot to comment on this. Actually, this is one of the oft-cited > unspecified corners of R6RS. BUT, but, all implementations to-date > have very similar library-name->file-name mapping, so, there should > not be a problem in practice. (anybody correct me if I'm wrong)
Well, I would have preferred to distribute a single plain text file and not a zip file or a tgz archive. From the examples in the R6RS document I thought the standard required implementations to support the single file format.
