On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 23:15 -0600, Eduardo Cavazos wrote: > On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 20:39 -0800, Derick Eddington wrote: > > > http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-103/mail-archive/msg00091.html > > > 1) Should the implicit file name support be removed? The sole motivation > > for it > > is so that (sub-)collections of files can be distributed and managed as > > stand-alone directories which can be moved around or deleted without having > > to > > remember and deal with straggler files outside the directory. However, > > having > > stand-alone directories can instead be accomplished with an explicit "main" > > or > > some other naming convention (i.e. instead of (foo) use (foo main)). Also, > > removing the implicit file name will remove the exceptional mapping of > > library > > names (--- main), (--- _main), etc. I personally am (now) neutral about > > removing the implicit file name. > > I'm OK with it being removed.
I can't hear you because you responded in the wrong place :) Please join SRFI 103's mailing list and respond there, so it gets recorded there and so the people there will see. Also, at the SRFI's mailing list, please clarify whether you are neutral or you'd like it removed. http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-103 Thanks, -- : Derick ----------------------------------------------------------------
