On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 17:14 -0800, Derick Eddington wrote:
> > I feel like you snuck in the mandated file name
> > extension and multiple dialect support in the previous revision without
> > much discussion. :-)
>
> I didn't sneak it in and it's up for discussion at the appropriate
> place, as you would have noticed if you had read the previous revision
> and were at the mailing list. I did ask for feedback about it by
> putting it in the most prominent official place for doing so: the Issues
> section.
Derick,
I was wrong to say that you snuck it in; I'm very sorry I said that.
Looking back through the discussion, you brought up the idea at least as
early as Oct 10th in this message:
http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-103/mail-archive/msg00072.html
And the document wasn't revised till the 20th:
http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-103/mail-archive/msg00077.html
So yeah, there was plenty of "warning" and a chance for objections to be
raised.
Thanks again for working on this SRFI. This is a very important one.
Ed
