On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 22:51 -0800, Derick Eddington wrote: > I was intentionally waiting, to avoid making the 'srfi' collection even > more inconsistent, but okay.
I respect and agree with this. It later occurred to me that perhaps a better route is to simply have a branch for this work in progress. That's what branches are for eh? :-) Ed
