On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 05:59 -0600, Eduardo Cavazos wrote: > On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 22:51 -0800, Derick Eddington wrote: > > > I was intentionally waiting, to avoid making the 'srfi' collection even > > more inconsistent, but okay. > > I respect and agree with this. It later occurred to me that perhaps a > better route is to simply have a branch for this work in progress. > That's what branches are for eh? :-)
Yeah :) You can put the branch under the Scheme Libraries LaunchPad project if you want. See https://launchpad.net/scheme-libraries for instructions for doing that. -- : Derick ----------------------------------------------------------------
