Hi! I've now started with splitting out stuff from spells, and stumbled upon one case I'd like to get feedback on: in the foof-loop package, I'd like to add `nested-foof-loop', a library built on foof-loop that provides for a more concise way of expressing nested loops. That library needs (a subset of) stream.scm[0], which I've extended in obvious ways with a few procedures having the same interface as SRFI 41 (Streams). Now streams.scm is very minimal, and the extensions have precedence in SRFI 41 -- does it make sense to include them in the "ported" collection, or should I refrain from doing so? Arguments in either direction would be appriciated!
[ Why not use SRFI-41 directly? streams.scm builds upon SRFI 45 (Primitives for Expressing Iterative Lazy Algorithms), and the space leak explained in that SRFI is essential to be fixed for nested-foof-loop. ] [0] http://mumble.net/~campbell/scheme/stream.scm Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>
