Hi, First things first. Thanks for creating such a wonderful tool. We use Antlr for our project work, and recently we switched to using composite grammars, as we are a distributed team, and multiple people need to modify various portions of the grammar file.
While most things just work out of the box or could be trivially worked around, one breaking issue is related to the way the lexer is generated, if the composite grammar defines any lexer rules. I am using Java code generation, and we see that the contents of the "header" defined either in the composite file or in the central lexer file does not get copied to the generated lexer code. This breaks our packaging structure, as the package statement is normally mentioned in the "header" section of either the central or composite grammars, and because it does not propagate to the generated lexer code, it breaks compilation. I see that the same issue was reported last year and a bug has been filed for the same - http://www.antlr.org/jira/browse/ANTLR-370 It would be great if anyone can provide a workaround for this or can provide any updates on the potential fix. Thanks again for creating this (I mean the tool, not the bug :)). Thanks, :-) "To err is human, to moo is bovine" (Yup taken from the ANTLR book) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
