> At 03:31 17/04/2009, Kumar Rangarajan wrote:
>> While most things just work out of the box or could be trivially
>> worked around, one breaking issue is related to the way the lexer
>> is generated, if the composite grammar defines any lexer rules. I
>> am using Java code generation, and we see that the contents of the
>> "header" defined either in the composite file or in the central
>> lexer file does not get copied to the generated lexer code.
>
> @parser::header {
> package foo;
> }
> @lexer::header {
> package foo;
> }
Sorry, missed replying for this reply. Thanks, Gavin for your
suggestion. But I tried this, but this does seem to work as Antlr does
seem to allow both @parser::header and @lexer::header sections in the
composite grammar. By default it seems to treat the grammar as a
parser grammar and adding '@lexer' triggers an error.
:-)
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"il-antlr-interest" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
