Michael,
the answer must be a) , if anything happens that shut down the
service it must come back as it was.
Thanks,
Mikael
On Feb 3, 2009, at 8:28 PM, Michael Schuster wrote:
> All,
>
> We've added "ilbadm shutdown" for support of SMF (among other
> things) to
> the list of subcommands.
>
> for background: as expected, this command will terminate the ild
> daemon and
> deactivate all rules in the kernel. Here's where I'd like some
> feedback:
>
> - should "shutdown" cause all rules to be marked 'inactive' in (or
> even be
> removed from) persistent storage, ie, when ilbd gets restarted, what
> is the
> expected behaviour:
> a) all the rules that were present before the shutdown command
> will be
> active again
> or
> b) no rules will be active (or even present in the kernel).
> c) ???
>
> My personal preference would be a), but as I said, please give me
> your opinion.
>
> thx
> Michael
> --
> Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
> Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
> _______________________________________________
> ilb-dev mailing list
> ilb-dev at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ilb-dev
Mikael Lofstrand
Chief Technologist, Networking
Sun Microsystems
Vikingsgatan 1
Gothenburg SE-411 04 Sweden
Phone +46-31-6349 19 / x24019
Fax +46 31 634999
Email Mikael.Lofstrand at Sun.COM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ilb-dev/attachments/20090203/24581668/attachment.html>
