Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On 26-Aug-08, at 11:15 PM, Sujith wrote:
Yes, you are right that there a few final gatekeepers who manage the
releases, but
it encourages a model where your code will be reviewed by many people
before
finally being accepted.
which doesnt happen in svn repo projects?
It can and Subversion developers themselves are big on review and
enforce it consistently via cultural means (Refer
http://producingoss.com/) but I would argue that the nature of the
system doesn't by itself encourage it. It would really depend on the
workflow. If you are using one of the DVCS's, almost any non-trivial
work can go into a alternative branch and commits be done offline. Merge
back is easy and fast. It can be viewed coherently as a whole instead of
in terms of files which is important IMO for review.
Rahul
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe <password> <address>"
in the subject or body of the message.
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
