On Sunday 29 March 2009 13:59:58 LinuXpert Academy wrote: > >In short "No License" at all. I remember reading somewhere that a FOSS > >Business Model based on "No" license is a "bigger evil" than EULA. > > I think it would be nice to stop this thread at this stage with my last > reply to the above. > > Since we are a solution provider, providing solutions/support to the > educational institutions is the only business model we follow and not > engaged in any other kind of development in this product and we are not > interested to put our own licenses into that and confuse others. > > Instead of giving tons of DVDs to these institutions freely (earlier I was > doing this way), we put altogether and giving them in a box and providing > support for that box in case of any hardware problems. > > I am not sure whether this info. helps you and also request you not to > reply to this list and if you need more info, pl. send a private mail to > linuxbas...@gmail.com
I agree - one guy is making money from foss - and spreading foss and everyone is criticising him. What is wrong with what he is doing?? OK, he may not understand GPL, but only 2 people in the world understand GPL - and they disagree. -- regards kg http://lawgon.livejournal.com _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, email ilugc-requ...@ae.iitm.ac.in with "unsubscribe <password> <address>" in the subject or body of the message. http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
