On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:37 PM, pavithran <pavithra...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't understand why fedora project cares to write about various ways of > removing fedora .. huh . I think fedora is better off improving individual > package documentation . Well, this is probably because it knows people would not need it anyway. That is the air of confidence that Fedora has in itsefl. It is there for those who need it anyway. We dont want to force users to work hard to do what they want to do.
> /me loves Ubuntu docs & they rock !! > /me uses Debian . > RPM days are passé When is Debian scheduled to get something like presto? My friends can do without 300MB of security updates every week. I know there are talks of deb-delta, but it is not mainstream yet. I am not flaming any distro. I just feel every distro has its place and none is superior. There are places where Archlinux outshines all the rest. The wiki is one of the best out there. Package management is KISS and kick-ass fast. There are places where foresight's/rpath's conary is much better than debs. Respect each distro for what it does --- Ashok `ScriptDevil` Gautham _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, email ilugc-requ...@ae.iitm.ac.in with "unsubscribe <password> <address>" in the subject or body of the message. http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
