On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Girish Venkatachalam <girishvenkatacha...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Arun Kumar <open.sou...@gmx.com> wrote: >> Folks, appreciate your suggestions/responses but for some reason >> we started top posting to the list with or without sorry. Can we >> please stick to the list protocols? Also I see no reason why we ask >> sorry first and then top post? am I missing something here? > > You are missing the fact that top posting is not a sin. > > Sometimes when you are busy you do that. > > I have done that many times. > > It is not as sinful as people imagine. > > If you want LUG to get responses from busy people responsible for > businesses and so on(the people that know what they are talking) > then you have to put up with some inconveniences like this. > > -Girish
Well, I'm coming to the point exactly what you're talking about but the reply adds some flavor like privately owned approach to the list. What I was trying to say in my previous note we need to be more practical to all level of folks joining in this list. It's not something I'm forward on something today than others and follow things which may no where related to sin or any other related terms. It's all about how our own protocols being followed or keep the things simple as it as. More over, it may well reasonable piece (quote from your reply) and I've no where near to that but I'm bit puzzled though. <quote> If you want LUG to get responses from busy people responsible for businesses and so on(the people that know what they are talking) then you have to put up with some inconveniences like this. </quote> _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
