On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 15:55, Rahul Sundaram <methe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/22/2011 03:28 PM, Roshan Mathews wrote:
>> In that
>> case you were only unaware of the deal, which you post facto decided
>> to call "an informal agreement", despite it being characterized as a
>> written promise.
>
> I don't see it characterized as a written promise. If you are aware of
> a written promise, then do point me to it. Otherwise, I have no reason
> to believe that.
>
I've already linked to, and quoted the relevant source.
This is what you initially tried to refute:
* Ghostscript had a deal with FSF to make the
latest-but-one version GPL, but they sold the latest
version with a commercial license.
I could keep chasing you around as you continue making new
assertions, but this has gone on long enough.
--
http://about.me/rosh
_______________________________________________
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
