On 03/22/2011 03:58 PM, Roshan Mathews wrote: > I've already linked to, and quoted the relevant source.
The source doesn't show any written agreement. > This is what you initially tried to refute: > > * Ghostscript had a deal with FSF to make the > latest-but-one version GPL, but they sold the latest > version with a commercial license. > > I could keep chasing you around as you continue making new > assertions, but this has gone on long enough. No new claims were made. I merely refused yours. You have failed to address my point which is that Aladdin could not have transferred copyright to FSF and practised dual licensing at the same time. I rest my case. Rahul _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
