Anant Narayanan wrote: >> opening a file has little to do with the extension -> browser. Its more >> to do with how the browser identifies its mime time and allocates an >> handler process. So look for issues that might have a role to play in >> wrong mime type reporting. >> >> also, when the fsck did microsoft fork html ? > > *.mht are integrated HTML files; and contain everything needed to > display a particular page in its entirety. So if a HTML has an image and > is saved as MHT; the image is part of that single file too. >
so its not really just a microsoft's version of html, as was originally implied.. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
