On 17-Aug-07, at 5:36 PM, Anupam Jain wrote: >> not one refereince, no external sources, not neutral 'we are doing >> this - we will be doing that' - this is an appropriate post for >> wikinews, not wikipedia. >> >> > My sentiments exactly. Also, why isn't the entry "Freed.in" instead of > "Freed"? (Grabbing the most popular keywords huh, forget about > accuracy!) > This is certainly not the way to promote Freed.in. > > And the editing has been done shabbily, with the original entry for > "Freed" > left as it is down at the bottom. This is just wrong.
of course, i *have* noticed that wikipedia editors tend to be a little lenient with stuff coming out of India as they feel we are a backward country and, if judged by stricter western standards, may get discouraged - so the article *may* slip through. -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves Associate, NRC-FOSS [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/ _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Next Event: http://freed.in - September 28-29, 2007 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
