On Nov 11, 2007 6:36 PM, Kazim Zaidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/11/2007, Vikas Rawal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I really think these big distribution upgrades every six months are a > > nuisance. They need to have a strategy that allows more gradual upgrades > > for > > about two years, and then perhaps do a full distribution change. I > really > > wish Ubuntu stayed closer to Debian on some of these basic things. > > > > > Vikas > > > There's nothing really wrong with that distribution cycle. In fact, time > based release cycle is a good balance between features and quality. > If you're not able to keep pace with the releases, know that they are > supported for 18 months. And the LTS (like Dapper Drake) are supported > for 18 months. > So there's no good reason to upgrade every six months. In fact, I > alternately > upgrade my system (every 12 months). I skipped Edgy, and I'll skip Gutsy > too. > i still using Fiesty as well.. i have always ordered the ubuntu cds, and whenever the cd gets delivered i upgrade..!!
-- Sahil MCA(SE) USIT GGSIPU, Kashmere Gate Delhi _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Next Event: http://freed.in - September 28-29, 2007 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
