[SNIP] > > So if the uploader's beautiful, Osho-nice naturescapes bliss out video > becomes a background to a toilet paper advert, he can still give the video > out to others via blip.tv or whatever - he just can't do it from Youtube.
HAHAHAHA! splendid anal-ogy... PJ, leading to sudden creative-commons and muft and mukt enlightenment. :-) > > [snip]> > Anyway, probably a sensible way to distribute content would be for the > uploader > to put up some content on Youtube, and a superset of that content on blip.tv > (and suggest on Youtube that people pick up the full content from blip.tv). depends on the creativecommons-license. if i publish under a cc-by-nd-sa 3.0 license, or a cc-by-nd-nc 3.0 license, these automatically break the youtube EULA. > > Bottom line: if you want to help uphold the ideas behind "free as in freedom", > then, when distributing video content, use blip.tv in preference to youtube. > > PJ > to take this discussion forward, PJ, see you at freed.in in february 2008. http://freed.in regards niyam -- niyam bhushan _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22/23, 2008 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
