Hi
> Just curious. Do you have a particular reason to use double NAT? > > For example, if you enable DHCP in the DSL router(if you are using dhcp > for office machines), connect it to the LAN port(not the uplink port) of > the wireless router, and disable DHCP on the wireless router ... you > would only have a single private network in the office. Managing a > single level of NAT on the external router is going to be simpler if you > are going to rely on it a lot. > No real reason. Just that the internet access was setup that way so i was working on that only. Will give this a try. Any tradeoffs for using the dhcp server on the dsl router vs dhcp on the wireless router? Although I would still like to figure out why the existing setup isnt working. Thanks -- Puneet http://sahyog.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22-24, 2008 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
