I have a problem of accommodating a large increase in the number of users on my LAN, without proper planning at the level of the router. The router now has a throttle of around 50%! Fortunately, in our times of excess, we had not implemented web-caching. This, I hope, could be the short-term answer to serving the users on the LAN and reducing throttle.
For administrative issues, it is best if squid is implemented as a transparent cache. Most info on the net has squid sitting on the router, and is transparent only to the client. Since content filtering etc, is provided through a UTM box - Cyberoam - I need squid to be transparent to both client and web-server. TPROXY promises such a feature. Does anyone have the experience in setting this kind of a configuration, and can point me to some easy-to-follow how-tos? Would also be glad to hear from anyone who has another solution. Regards, Andrew _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
