Christopher Barker wrote: > I haven't built PIL in a while -- do you still need to build the core > library with a regular old make before building the extension? Or does > distutils build the whole thing? If the former, it will take some > tweaking to make sure that it's built universal.
PIL has used a single setup file since 1.1.5. > Fredrik, I guess it's clear why you haven't done this before. Sigh. the lack of Mac OS X boxes in my office part of the problem, I think (guess we're not hip enough ;-) > I'm going to post a note to the pythonmac list to clarify if we can > build a single binary for both Apple's 2.5 and MacPython2.5 -- if so, > that's the best option. sounds great. thanks! </F> _______________________________________________ Image-SIG maillist - Image-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig
