Fredrik Lundh wrote:
The problem is that too many people arguing for eggs do this by
sending nastygrams, which doesn't really provide much motivation for
doing anything about it (I don't do asshole-driven development).
Indeed, I couldn't agree more, and I'm sorry you've been subjected to this.
My (hopefully more polite) request still stands though:
>> Would there be any problems for you in naming the distribution in a
>> setuptools-friendly way from the next point release?
> The
public review PIL got a couple a minutes ago matches some of the
private mail I've gotten:
no egg - worst seen ever, remove it from pypi or provide an egg
(jensens, 2009-10-05, 0 points)
*sigh*
Interesting timing, myself and Doug Hellmann have been trying to
persuade Martin von Lewis that while ratings are fine, the commenting
system is likely to be abused:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=513503&aid=2866081&group_id=66150
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=513503&aid=2872293&group_id=66150
I'll put in a request to have that comment removed...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Image-SIG maillist - Image-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig
