>It's about the RFCs, which, as you concur, suggest that the standard >headers were designed to be considered trustworthy Screw the RFC's saying headers are "trustworthy", all from/to headers are forgeable extremely easily. Why are we even discussing this blatant, unchallengeabble, banally verifiable point? Listen, all you Trust-the-Headers people, you go run "relay for local user/domains" and let us know how your trust pays you back within in a few weeks, if not sooner. Len Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
- RE: [IMail Forum] HEADER QUESTION Sanford Whiteman
- RE: [IMail Forum] HEADER QUESTIO... Len Conrad
- RE: [IMail Forum] HEADER QUE... Sanford Whiteman
- FW: [IMail Forum] HEADER QUESTION Anthony Abby
- [IMail Forum] IMail and Win2k Arthur Donchey
- Re: [IMail Forum] IMail and Win2k Daniel Donnelly
- [IMail Forum] long messages get glit... Tom Hanlin
- RE: [IMail Forum] HEADER QUESTION scott.perry
- RE: [IMail Forum] HEADER QUESTION Sanford Whiteman
- RE: [IMail Forum] HEADER QUESTION Philip Butler
- RE: [IMail Forum] HEADER QUESTIO... Len Conrad
- RE: [IMail Forum] HEADER QUE... Philip Butler
- RE: [IMail Forum] HEADE... Len Conrad
- Re: [IMail Forum] HEADE... NetQuick Mail Administration
- Re: [IMail Forum] HEADER QUE... NetQuick Mail Administration
- RE: [IMail Forum] HEADE... Sanford Whiteman
- RE: [IMail Forum] HEADER QUE... Sanford Whiteman
- RE: [IMail Forum] HEADE... Don Brown
- RE: [IMail Forum] H... Sanford Whiteman
