since having the option is a violation of RFC's then why does IMail even
give you the option?
----- Original Message -----
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 10:29 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Spike in log files
> > Please read the following piece about this fellow that is having a
problem
> > with IMail: I thought that you might like to see this message. I saw
your
> > postings on the newsgroup as well. I thought you might like to see what
> > IPSwitch's official standpoint is.
>
> FYI, the "Refuse NULL <> Senders" option in IMail should NEVER BE CHECKED.
> If you have this checked, you are violating RFCs and will NOT receive
bounce
> messages, and you have to be willing to accept whatever other risks may
come
> about.
>
> The only issue is that the help files and such should make it VERY clear
> that this option should not be checked (otherwise, people will check it
> without realizing that they are making a mistake).
> -Scott
>
> Declude: Anti-spam and Anti-virus solutions for IMail.
> http://www.declude.com
>
>
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> An Archive of this list is available at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
