Len, I'll get those figures for you. It's fairly substantial. As far as Declude, I'll check into it. Regarding ImgateAV, you sure are an advocate of IMgate aren't you :) To be honest, I am using a sendmail relay at the moment, shortly moving to postfix, due to reading about IMgate. ImgateAV? What's up with that? postfix+Amavis+some_unix_virii_scanner? You have a writeup anywhere about that? It's my understanding that it's more difficult to filter on a relay machine based upon the fact that it's easier to filter when the users are local to the unix box. -- Hans ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: Len Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 15:10:19 +0100 > >>I understand that the server would incur a tremendous load >>(especially on a machine serving 10-30,000 email addresses). > >It's now how many mailboxes you have, it's how many msgs and >megabytes per day. do you have those numbers? If you box is already >fairly well loaded, throwing antispam and antivirus onto it may not >be much fun. Try Declude. If you box can still work comfortably, you're done. > >If not, build an ImgateAV box. > >Len > > > >http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : Binary for ISC BIND 8.2.3 T9B for NT4 & W2K >http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-spam mail gateways > > >Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >to be removed from this list. > >An Archive of this list is available at: >http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
