>As far as Declude, I'll check into it. Regarding ImgateAV, you sure
>are an advocate of IMgate aren't you :)
Only a parent could love that ugly baby!
>To be honest, I am using a sendmail relay at the moment, shortly
>moving to postfix, due to reading about IMgate.
smart move, postfix is much simpler, no M4 macros and obscure
params. and it's fast. I installed a list server this weekend for
list renting business (he replaced Lyris, very happily). His first
message to a list of 19K addresses was over have done in 9 minutes,
about 1000 msgs delivered per minute, yep, a msg every 16
milliseconds!! But we cheated, postfix was running 250 SMTP sending processes!
>ImgateAV? What's up with that? postfix+Amavis+some_unix_virii_scanner?
pretty obscure name, huh ?
>You have a writeup anywhere about that? It's my understanding that
>it's more difficult to filter on a relay machine based upon the fact
>that it's easier to filter when the users are local to the unix box.
??? IMGateAV is a relay-only machine, on local mailboxes. I can't
see why it's "harder" to scan relayed msgs vs mailbox msgs.
Len
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : Binary for ISC BIND 8.2.3 T9B for NT4 & W2K
http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-spam mail gateways
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
